This part is to be in the first person! Be creative...have fun with it!
Read 3 primary sources on the OPPOSITE position from which you wrote your paper (i.e. if you wrote your paper on pro-slavery, you will argue for abolition in the debate and vice versa).
Bring a one-page character explanation with you to the debate. Your character explanation should include the following:
![]() |
| In 1858 Stephen Douglas (front left on the platform) and Abraham Lincoln vied in a series of seven debates for a seat in the U.S. Senate. Douglas won the election, but Lincoln gained widespread recognition that ultimately helped him win the presidential election two years later. Borrowed from: Northern Illinois University |
Grading Rubric for the Debate:
A =Student presents her/his position in a well-informed manner at least once during the debate; student takes the opportunity to rebut another person’s stance on the issue at least once during the debate; student submits all written components and they are thorough; student treats all others in the debate with respect and does not interrupt or distract with private conversations
B = Student present his/her position well, but only presents her/his position once and is generally quiet during the group debate; student is well-informed about her/his position but does not assert it in order to rebut another’s position; student submits all written components, but they are less thorough than they should be; student treats all others in the debate with respect and does not interrupt or distract with private conversations
![]() |
| Abolitionist John Brown as depicted at Harper's Ferry National Historical Site -- Borrowed from: Cornell University |
C = Student's presentation of position is cursory and s/he does not participate at all in the large group discussion; student attentively listens to the activity; student submits written components that are incomplete or incorrect; student treats all others in the debate with respect, but engages in some distracting behavior
D/F = Student does not attend debate; or student is disruptive or disrespectful during the debate proceedings without offering anything of value. It is clear student did nothing to prepare for the debate